-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 382
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dapp staking v3 - part 4 #1053
dapp staking v3 - part 4 #1053
Conversation
9c316e2
to
0a7c519
Compare
bf15fc9
to
d36839c
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just had a look at the README part
/// Old era values cannot be added. | ||
OldEra, | ||
/// Old or future era values cannot be added. | ||
InvalidEra, | ||
/// Bounded storage capacity exceeded. | ||
NoCapacity, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What about MaxCapacityExceeded
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure what you mean - we don't have that error.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was suggesting to rename the field. But not really needed after all
// Check if the rewards have expired | ||
let protocol_state = ActiveProtocolState::<T>::get(); | ||
ensure!( | ||
staked_period >= Self::oldest_claimable_period(protocol_state.period_number()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If staked period
is < of oldest claimable period
no fund can be claimed as this ensure! will prevent from it.
In my undestanding staker can still claim the rewards that are between oldest claimable period
and now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That's correct. The check does that though, right? Or am I seeing it wrong? 😅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had a second look and I got it. Actually .staked_period()
return the last period eligible for rewards.
I was afraid that, if an user stake for let's say 1 year without claiming, even his from oldest claimable periodto
now` staking era will now be claimable. But they actually will
let staker_reward = Perbill::from_rational(amount, era_reward.staked) | ||
* era_reward.staker_reward_pool; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
let staker_reward = Perbill::from_rational(amount, era_reward.staked) | |
* era_reward.staker_reward_pool; | |
let staker_reward = Perbill::from_rational(amount, era_reward.staked).checked_mul(era_reward.staker_reward_pool).expect("CheckedMul never fail for PerThings; qed"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I wanted to do this, but there's no checked_mul
that takes an integer as an argument, only Self
type.
Had to go back to check this, but this is the code covering multiplication with an int:
/// Non-overflow multiplication.
///
/// This is tailored to be used with a balance type.
impl<N> ops::Mul<N> for $name
where
N: Clone + UniqueSaturatedInto<$type> + ops::Rem<N, Output=N>
+ ops::Div<N, Output=N> + ops::Mul<N, Output=N> + ops::Add<N, Output=N> + Unsigned,
$type: Into<N>,
{
type Output = N;
fn mul(self, b: N) -> Self::Output {
overflow_prune_mul::<N, Self>(b, self.deconstruct(), Rounding::NearestPrefDown)
}
}
let eligible_amount = staker_info.staked_amount(Subperiod::Voting); | ||
let bonus_reward = | ||
Perbill::from_rational(eligible_amount, period_end_info.total_vp_stake) | ||
* period_end_info.bonus_reward_pool; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same suggestion for explicit checked mul.
#[pallet::compact] era: EraNumber, | ||
) -> DispatchResult { | ||
Self::ensure_pallet_enabled()?; | ||
let _ = ensure_signed(origin)?; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shall we make sure only dApp owner or beneficiary can trigger the claim?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let me add a TODO for this - there's an open question whether we should allow others to claim rewards in general. We can handle it when considering that question.
} | ||
|
||
// Account exists since it has locked funds. | ||
T::Currency::deposit_into_existing(&account, reward_sum) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Token minting is very security-sensitive. IMO we need some level of sanity check for all minting, to make sure the reward amount never goes terribly wrong. No need to add in this PR but good to add a TODO item.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, and would like this to be done within Tokenomics 2.0 pallet.
I'll work on the design & implementation very soon.
Ok(()) | ||
} | ||
|
||
/// Used to force a change of era or subperiod. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add more info in docstring about when this is needed and why?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure!
Minimum allowed line rate is |
// Check if the rewards have expired | ||
let protocol_state = ActiveProtocolState::<T>::get(); | ||
ensure!( | ||
staked_period >= Self::oldest_claimable_period(protocol_state.period_number()), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Had a second look and I got it. Actually .staked_period()
return the last period eligible for rewards.
I was afraid that, if an user stake for let's say 1 year without claiming, even his from oldest claimable periodto
now` staking era will now be claimable. But they actually will
* dApp Staking v3 Part1 * Feat/dapp staking v3 phase2 (#991) * Phase2 progress * Adapt for 0.9.43 * Abstract sparse vector type * Further modifications * claim unlocked functionality WIP * claim unlocked tested * Relock unlocking * Check era when adding chunk * Custom error for some types * Additional type tests - WIP * More type tests * Review comments * Additional changes * dApp staking v3 - part 3 (#1036) * dApp staking v3 - PR3 * SingularStakingInfo * SingularStakingInfo tests * Stake work * Stake & lots of tests * TODOs, renaming, improvements * Refactoring & cleanup * More fixes * Rework series * Series tests * Minor adjustment * stake test utils & first test * Stake test * stake extrinsic tests * Era & Period change logic * Update era/period transition in mock & tests * on_init tests & refactoring * Unstake & some minor improvements * Lots of type tests for unstake * More tests * More types test * Testing utils for unstake, some TODOs * Unstake tests * Minor adjustments * Fixes * Additional scenario * Address review comments * Correct unstake amount * Tests * dapp staking v3 - part 4 (#1053) * EraRewardSpan * Initial version of claim_staker_reward * Tests * Test utils for claim-staker * Bug fixes, improvements * Claim improvements & some tests * Refactoring in progress * Refactoring continued * Refactoring progress * Refactoring finished * Bonus rewards * Docs & some minor changes * Comments, tests, improved coverage * Tier params & config init solution * Tier reward calculation WIP * Tier assignemnt * Minor cleanup * Claim dapp rewards * Claim dapp reward tests * unstake from unregistered call * Extra traits * fixes * Extra calls * Refactoring * More refactoring, improvements, TODO solving * Local integration * Genesis config * Add forcing call * try runtime build fix * Minor changes * Minor * Formatting * Benchmarks INIT * Compiling benchmarks * Fix * dapp tier calculation benchmark * Measured tier assignment * Decending rewards in benchmarks * Series refactoring & partial tests * Comments, minor changes * Tests, improvements * More tests, some minor refactoring * Formatting * More benchmarks & experiments, refactoring * Readme, docs * Minor renaming, docs * More docs * More docs * Minor addition * Review comment fixes & changes * Minor change * Review comments * Update frontier to make CI pass * Fix for cleanup * dapp staking v3 - part 5 (#1087) * EraRewardSpan * Initial version of claim_staker_reward * Tests * Test utils for claim-staker * Bug fixes, improvements * Claim improvements & some tests * Refactoring in progress * Refactoring continued * Refactoring progress * Refactoring finished * Bonus rewards * Docs & some minor changes * Comments, tests, improved coverage * Tier params & config init solution * Tier reward calculation WIP * Tier assignemnt * Minor cleanup * Claim dapp rewards * Claim dapp reward tests * unstake from unregistered call * Extra traits * fixes * Extra calls * Refactoring * More refactoring, improvements, TODO solving * Local integration * Genesis config * Add forcing call * try runtime build fix * Minor changes * Minor * Formatting * Benchmarks INIT * Compiling benchmarks * Fix * dapp tier calculation benchmark * Measured tier assignment * Decending rewards in benchmarks * Series refactoring & partial tests * Comments, minor changes * Tests, improvements * More tests, some minor refactoring * Formatting * More benchmarks & experiments, refactoring * Readme, docs * Minor renaming, docs * More docs * More docs * Minor addition * Review comment fixes & changes * Minor change * Review comments * Update frontier to make CI pass * dApp staking v3 - part 5 * Make check work * Limit map size to improve benchmarks * Fix for cleanup * Minor fixes, more tests * More fixes & test * Minor changes * More tests * More tests, some clippy fixes * Finished with type tests for now * Log, remove some TODOs * Changes * Bug fix for unstake era, more tests * Formatting, extra test * Unregistered unstake, expired cleanup, test utils & tests * Cleanup tests, minor fixes * force tests * Remove TODOs * Tier assignment test WIP * Finish dapp tier assignment test, fix reward calculation bug * Some renaming, test utils for era change WIP * Fix minor issues, propagaste renaming * More checks * Finish on_init tests * Comments, docs, some benchmarks * Benchmark progress * More benchmarks * Even more benchmarks * All extrinsics benchmarked * Expand tests * Comment * Missed error test * Review comments * Pallet inflation (#1091) * Pallet inflation * Hooks * Functionality, mock & benchmarks * Empty commit since it seems last push didn't work properly * Tests, fixes * More tests, minor fixes&changes * Zero divison protection, frontier update * More tests, minor changes * Integration & renaming * Genesis integration, more tests * Final integration * Cleanup deps * Division with zero test * Comments * More minor changes * Improve test coverage * Integrate into pallet-timestamp * Remove timestamp * Fix * review comments * toml format * dApp Staking v3 - part 6 (#1093) * dApp staking v3 part 6 * Minor refactor of benchmarks * Weights integration * Fix * remove orig file * Minor refactoring, more benchmark code * Extract on_init logic * Some renaming * More benchmarks * Full benchmarks integration * Testing primitives * staking primitives * dev fix * Integration part1 * Integration part2 * Reward payout integration * Replace lock functionality with freeze * Cleanup TODOs * More negative tests * Frozen balance test * Zero div * Docs for inflation * Rename is_active & add some more docs * More docs * pallet docs * text * scripts * More tests * Test, docs * Review comment * dApp staking v3 - part 7 (#1099) * dApp staking v3 part 6 * Minor refactor of benchmarks * Weights integration * Fix * remove orig file * Minor refactoring, more benchmark code * Extract on_init logic * Some renaming * More benchmarks * Full benchmarks integration * Testing primitives * staking primitives * dev fix * Integration part1 * Integration part2 * Reward payout integration * Replace lock functionality with freeze * Cleanup TODOs * More negative tests * Frozen balance test * Zero div * Docs for inflation * Rename is_active & add some more docs * More docs * pallet docs * text * scripts * More tests * Test, docs * Review comment * Runtime API * Changes * Change dep * Comment * Formatting * Expired entry cleanup * Cleanup logic test * Remove tier labels * fix * Improve README * Improved cleanup * Review comments * Docs * Formatting * Typo * Fix - bonus reward update ledger (#1102) * Bonus claim reduced contract_stake_count * Extra test * dApp Staking Migration (#1101) * dApp Staking Migration * Events, benchmark prep * benchmarks * Benchmarks & mock * weights * limit * Use extrinsic call * Solved todos, docs, improvements * Maintenance mode, on_runtime_upgrade logic * Tests, refactoring * Finish * More tests * Type cleanup * try-runtime checks * deps * Improve docs * Fixes & try-runtime testing modifications * Fix test * repeated * Minor improvements * Improvements * taplo * Minor rename * Feat/dapp staking v3 precompiles (#1096) * Init commit * All legacy calls covered * v2 interface first definition * Rename * Resolve merge errors * TODO * v2 init implementation * Prepared mock * todo * Migration to v2 utils * More adjustments * Finish adapting implementation to v2 * Mock & fixes * Primitive smart contract * Fix dsv3 test * Prepare impl & mock * Remove redundant code, adjust mock & prepare tests * Tests & utils * Test for legacy getters/view functions * More legacy tests * v1 interface covered with tests * Minor refactor, organization, improvements * v2 tests * Cleanup TODOs * More tests * Updates * docs * Fixes * Address review comments * Adjustments * Audit comments * Fix mock * FMT * Review comments * Fix for incorrect freeze amount (#1111) * dApp Staking v3 - Shibuya integration (#1109) * dApp staking v3 - Shibuya integration * Init * Fix build * Fix find/replace doc mess * Migration & disable * More integration * Progress * Adjusted integration * Finished integration * Additional modifications & cleanup * Move comment * Fixes * Shibuya integration tests fix & proxy * Renaming * Integration test fixes & legacy support * Adjust for benchmarks * Remove chain-extension, small updates * fixes * Partial weights * Minor changes * Benchmark fixes * dApp staking weights * Weights, deps * Remove redundant storage item * Inflation params, resolve TODOs * Optimize lengthy benchmark * Integration test * Sort out more TODOs * Benchmark optimization * Fix seed * Remove spec version bump * Fix integration test * Weights update
Pull Request Summary
Introduces all the remaining dApp staking v3 functionality required for MVP.
Code is almost feature complete, with various TODOs scattered around.
Overview
The following list is an overview of what was introduced & changed in this PR:
on_initialize
logic is implemented (although it might be refactored later)claim_staker_rewards
,claim_bonus_reward
andclaim_dapp_reward
unstake_from_unregistered
call for handling specific situation when contract has been unregistered while stakedcleanup_expired_entries
to help with situations when user has inactive stake entriesforce
call to help force eras and periods (primary use is for testing)NOTE: Leftover TODOs will be handled in the part 5 PR.
TODO
ContractStakeAmountSeries
in case no off-chain worker is needed (approach fromAccountLedger
can be reused)(unsolved TODOs moved to part 5 PR)